Microservices
-
Orchestration vs Choreography
Learn about the benefits and disadvantages of using Orchestration or Choreography for your microservice architecture.
-
How Atlassian uses Camunda within their hyperautomation...
Learn why Atlassian turned to process orchestration to hyperautomate their tech stack with Camunda and deliver improved customer and employee experiences.
-
Boosting your microservice architecture with message broker...
With Amazon SQS, SNS, and Lambda Connectors, as well as Kafka and RabbitMQ Connectors, microservice choreography and orchestration get even closer together.
-
7 Best Programming Languages for Microservices
Microservices are an architectural style that structures an application as a collection of services that are: Highly maintainable and testable Loosely coupled Independently deployable Organized around business capabilities Owned by a small team Conway’s Law states that “any organization that designs a system (defined broadly) will produce a design whose structure is a copy of the organization’s communication structure”. If your organization has multiple teams working on different parts of a larger system, then microservices can serve as a separation of concerns that map an independent, encapsulated service to a specific team. These teams have clear boundaries of responsibility and can deploy on their own schedule. These factors lend themselves to a polyglot approach. What this means is that because...
-
2022 Automation Trends, Questions and Answers
Dive into our answers for the top-ranked questions from our recent webinar, Looking Back to the Future: 5 Process Automation Trends in 2022.
-
Migrating from Monolith to Microservices
Outgrowing your monolithic architecture? Explore our best practices and tips on leveraging microservices in your automation program.
-
The Results Are In! A Review of The 2018 Microservices Orchestration Survey
In this blog post, we’ll share a few highlights from the microservices orchestration survey that we fielded in July 2018.